Formaldehyde
CASRN 50-00-0 | DTXSID7020637
- Toxicological Review (PDF) (927 pp, 16.3 MB)
- IRIS Executive Summary (PDF) (10 pp, 450.2 KB)
Analysis of the Sensitivity and Uncertainty in 2-Stage Clonal Growth Models for Formaldehyde with Relevance to Other Biologically-Based Dose Response (BBDR) Models
Notice - This site contains archived material(s)
Archive disclaimer
Archived files are provided for reference purposes only.
The file was current when produced, but is no longer maintained and may now be outdated.
Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing archived files may contact the Risk Webmaster for assistance.
Please use the contact us form if you need additional support.
Overview
Citation
Background
The publications resulting from the NCEA research indicate that when two-stage modeling assumptions are varied, resulting dose-response estimates can vary by several orders of magnitude. These findings are not supportive of interpreting the CIIT model results as providing a conservative (health protective) estimate on human risk. NCEA research also examined the contribution of the two-stage modeling for formaldehyde towards characterizing the relative weights of key events in the mode-of-action of a carcinogen. For example, the model-based inference in the published CIIT study that formaldehyde’s direct mutagenic action is not relevant to the compound’s tumorigenicity was found not to hold under variations of modeling assumptions.
The analyses presented here emphasize that uncertainty and sensitivity analyses are essential tools when evaluating inferences about fundamental biological processes (e.g., modes of action) that may be drawn from a BBDR model. The approaches used and conclusions drawn in this report also provide insights for investigators looking towards future applications of BBDR models in risk assessment.
History/Chronology
Date | Description |
---|---|
1999 | The Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology (CIIT; now called The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences) published a Health Risk Assessment Report on Formaldehyde. |
2000-2004 | Several articles by Drs. Conolly, Kimbell, Overton, Schlosser and co-workers are published in the peer-reviewed literature. These papers detail the dosimetry and clonal growth models utilized in the above CIIT 1999 report for estimating dose-response and cancer risk due to inhaled formaldehyde. |
2005-2006 | U.S. EPA uses the CIIT modeling results in risk assessment and rule making - represents early example of use of BBDR modeling for decision making needs. |
2007-2008 | Publications examining uncertainties in the CIIT modeling results appear in the two peer-reviewed journals, Risk Analysis and Annals of Occupational Hygiene. |
Status
Download(s)
This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
- Analysis of the Sensitivity and Uncertainty in 2-stage Clonal Growth Models for Formaldehyde with Relevance to Other Biologically Based Dose Response (BBDR) Models (PDF) (9 pp, 45.9 KB, about PDF)
- Subramaniam, R; Chen, C; Crump, K; .et .al. (2008) Uncertainties in biologically-based modeling of formaldehyde-induced cancer risk: identification of key issues. Risk Anal 28(4):907-923. (PDF) (17 pp, 405.3 KB, about PDF)
- Subramaniam, R; Chen, C; Crump, K; .et .al. (2007) Uncertainties in the CIIT 2-stage model for formaldehyde-induced nasal cancer in the F344 rat: a limited sensitivity analysis-I. Risk Anal 27:1237 (PDF) (18 pp, 438.5 KB, about PDF)
If you have a disability and the format of any material on our web pages interferes with your ability to access the information, please reach out to us using the Contact Us about IRIS form for assistance. To enable us to respond in a manner most helpful to you, please indicate the nature of the accessibility problem, the web address of the requested material, your preferred format in which you want to receive the material (electronic format (ASCII, etc.), standard print, large print, etc.), and your contact information.
Document Related Link(s)
-
Crump, K; Chen, C; Fox, J; .et .al. (2008) Sensitivity analysis of biologically motivated model for formaldehyde-induced respiratory cancer in humans. Ann Occup Hyg 52:481-495.
-
Conolly RB, Miller FJ, Kimbell JS, Janszen D 2009. Formaldehyde risk assessment. Ann Occup Hyg 53: 181–184.
-
Crump, KS; Chen, C; Fox, JF; et al. (2009) Reply to Conolly et al. (2009) Ann Occup Hyg 53:184–189.